The UK Meteorological Office has provided the 6-hourly analyses
and the intervening hourly forecasts from the mesoscale version of
the Unified Model for the flight days of CLARE (if you are interested
in other days during the CLARE campaign then you will have to use ECMWF
model data, which includes every day of the campaign but only
over Chilbolton). Two types of file are provided: the basic model model data at each model level along the
flight tracks and model data plus derived 35 and
94 GHz radar attenuation parameters for Chilbolton only on the
flight days. The latter provides information necessary to correct for
attenuation and use differential attenuation to estimate liquid water
content. See also the brief notes at the end of
this document.
Model data on flight days
The flights were fortunately all along the same 260
degree azimuth to Chilbolton, and for each flight day I have
interpolated the model fields on to six points along the flight track
of the aircraft. The points are 10 km apart. The model resolution is
around 12.25 km in the horizontal. Interpolation has been performed
using an inverse distance method in the horizontal, but no
interpolation has been performed in the vertical (the data is on the
original 35 levels). The longitude and latitude of the interpolation
points are close to the following:
Dist. from Chilbolton Longitude (deg. East) Latitude (deg. North) 0 km -1.4370 51.1445 10 km -1.579 51.129 20 km -1.719 51.113 30 km -1.861 51.098 40 km -2.002 51.082 50 km -2.143 51.066
The format used is similar to the ECMWF model data for the CLARE campaign, which was provided by ECMWF already interpolated over Chilbolton.
Each flight day consists of 6 compressed files corresponding to the 6 points along the flight track. Only Chilbolton data has been extracted for non-flight days. These files are named:
UKMO_yymmdd_kk_var.Zwhere kk is the distance from Chilbolton in km. The compressed size of each file is around 36 kBytes, uncompressed is 135 kBytes.
Right-click on the following links to download a day of data:
UKMO_981007_00_var.Z (7 October)
UKMO_981007_10_var.Z (7 October)
UKMO_981007_20_var.Z (7 October)
UKMO_981007_30_var.Z (7 October)
UKMO_981007_40_var.Z (7 October)
UKMO_981007_50_var.Z (7 October)
UKMO_981013_00_var.Z (13 October)
UKMO_981013_10_var.Z (13 October)
UKMO_981013_20_var.Z (13 October)
UKMO_981013_30_var.Z (13 October)
UKMO_981013_40_var.Z (13 October)
UKMO_981013_50_var.Z (13 October)
UKMO_981014_00_var.Z (14 October)
UKMO_981014_10_var.Z (14 October)
UKMO_981014_20_var.Z (14 October)
UKMO_981014_30_var.Z (14 October)
UKMO_981014_40_var.Z (14 October)
UKMO_981014_50_var.Z (14 October)
UKMO_981016_00_var.Z (16 October)
UKMO_981016_10_var.Z (16 October)
UKMO_981016_20_var.Z (16 October)
UKMO_981016_30_var.Z (16 October)
UKMO_981016_40_var.Z (16 October)
UKMO_981016_50_var.Z (16 October)
UKMO_981020_00_var.Z (20 October)
UKMO_981020_10_var.Z (20 October)
UKMO_981020_20_var.Z (20 October)
UKMO_981020_30_var.Z (20 October)
UKMO_981020_40_var.Z (20 October)
UKMO_981020_50_var.Z (20 October)
UKMO_981021_00_var.Z (21 October)
UKMO_981021_10_var.Z (21 October)
UKMO_981021_20_var.Z (21 October)
UKMO_981021_30_var.Z (21 October)
UKMO_981021_40_var.Z (21 October)
UKMO_981021_50_var.Z (21 October)
UKMO_981022_00_var.Z (22 October)
UKMO_981022_10_var.Z (22 October)
UKMO_981022_20_var.Z (22 October)
UKMO_981022_30_var.Z (22 October)
UKMO_981022_40_var.Z (22 October)
UKMO_981022_50_var.Z (22 October)
Each file starts with a 3 line header. The first line explains the second. The four numbers on the second line are latitude, longitude, the y-location of the interpolation point on the mesoscale grid and the x-location of the point on the mesoscale grid (where the first grid-point in each direction is `1'). The third line describes the data which follows. The first two columns of data are 'date' and 'time', the date and hour (UTC) of the analysis or forecast.
The data is held on the 35 model levels. Level 1 is the lowest level and level 35 is the highest. Note that this is the opposite convention to that used by ECMWF. The order of the remaining variables is as follows:
lev - integer model level
zlevs - height above mean sea level (m)
p - pressure (Pa)
u - zonal wind component (m/s)
v - meridional wind component (m/s)
T - temperature (K)
q - water vapour density (kg/m3)
LWC - cloud liquid water content (kg/m3)
IWC - cloud ice water content (kg/m3)
RH - relative humidity (percent/100.)
omega - vertical velocity in pressure coordinates (Pa/s)
Ag94 - one-way gaseous attenuation at 94 GHz (dB/km)
UKMO_981007_diffatten_var.Z (7 October)
UKMO_981013_diffatten_var.Z (13 October)
UKMO_981014_diffatten_var.Z (14 October)
UKMO_981016_diffatten_var.Z (16 October)
UKMO_981020_diffatten_var.Z (20 October)
UKMO_981021_diffatten_var.Z (21 October)
UKMO_981022_diffatten_var.Z (22 October)
lev - integer model level
zlevs - height above mean sea level (m)
p - pressure (Pa)
u - zonal wind component (m/s)
v - meridional wind component (m/s)
T - temperature (K)
q - water vapour density (kg/m3)
LWC - cloud liquid water content (kg/m3)
IWC - cloud ice water content (kg/m3)
RH - relative humidity (percent/100.)
omega - vertical velocity in pressure coordinates (Pa/s)
Ag35 - one-way gaseous attenuation at 35 GHz, using model temperature, pressure and humidity (dB/km)
Ag94 - one-way gaseous attenuation at 94 GHz, using model temperature, pressure and humidity (dB/km)
Ag35sat - one-way gaseous attenuation at 35 GHz, using model temperature and pressure but assuming saturation with respect to water or ice depending on the temperature (dB/km)
Ag94sat - one-way gaseous attenuation at 94 GHz, using model temperature and pressure but assuming saturation with respect to water or ice depending on the temperature (dB/km)
Al35 - one-way liquid water attenuation (Rayleigh approximation) at 35 GHz (dB km-1 (g m-3)-1)
Al94 - one-way liquid water attenuation (Rayleigh approximation) at 94 GHz (dB km-1 (g m-3)-1)
K235 - dielectric parameter |K|2 of liquid water at 35 GHz (dimensionless)
K294 - dielectric parameter |K|2 of liquid water at 94 GHz (dimensionless)
Relative humidity was calculated directly from q and T and is taken to be with respect to ice below 0°C and with respect to liquid water above. Note that the water contents are in kg/m3 rather than kg/kg as used by the ECMWF.
The attenuation at 35 and 94 GHz due to atmospheric gases (predominantly water-vapour and oxygen),`Ag35' and `Ag94', were calculated from the UKMO model parameters using the line-by-line model of Liebe (1985), Radio Science, 20, 1069-1089. The dielectric constant of liquid water from which the liquid-water attenuation and |K|2 were calculated was taken from Liebe, Manabe and Hufford (1989), IEEE AP, 37, 1617-1623.
Many thanks to Ed Dicks and Peter Panagi for providing the raw data.
Problems with extraction should be addressed to Robin Hogan.